It does not modify the clipboard until instructed to. I'm viewing the clipboard pre-paste with an app called Pastebot, which stores clipboard history beyond the current clipboard and lets you view or perform actions on the current clipboard. Open a program that can receive text that isn't part of Libre Office, such as Text Edit. Select the now visible cells from the Number column:Ĥ. Filter the sheet so only rows with "Monday" in the Day column are shown.ģ. Create a multi-column, multi-row spreadsheet with a header row. Interestingly, with some external text editors (TextMate, for example) I can select the visible cells with the mouse, then drag-and-drop paste into the editor exactly the cells you have selected, but that operation doesn't use the MacOS clipboard.ġ. In the 5.x branch of LibreOffice the expected behavior (only visible selected cells are copied) occurs. It may be the exact object copied to the clipboard contains the whole range with certain metadata indicating to compatible apps what should be shown (which would allow copying the whole range with the filter in place between spreadsheets), but this would seem to be a counter-intuitive behavior, and it's certainly a new behavior. Share Improve this answer Follow answered at 22:07 Todd Curry 1,026 1 10 23 Add a comment 2 SQLite may not be looking for the right separator. Plain text editors, on the other hand, get the whole range (exactly what's in the clipboard). For anyone looking at this (5 years later), in TextWrangler on Mac, you select 'Save As' Unicode (UTF-8) and Unix (LF). As long as you continue to hold down Shift + alt, you will be able to adjust the selected text. Press and hold Shift + alt and place cursor to the right of the final character you want selected (you can scroll all the down the page but continue to hold Shift + alt). Other LibreOffice apps get only what I've selected, as do other competing office applications. Place the cursor to the left of the first Character/column you want to select. What is actually pasted seems to depend on the target application, however. However, what I see is that all cells in the range (including cells filtered out based on my filter) are copied as well, if I view the clipboard directly as plain text. When selecting cells in a filtered table and copying them to the clipboard, I would normally expect only the selected visible cells to be copied. I've not tried in other operating systems. It may have occurred in earlier releases in the 6.x branch, but I haven't had the occasion to test those. Is there a way to avoid this behavior (while maintaining the Fortran syntax highlighting)? As the program is quite long, I'd like to avoid rewriting it all to free-format Fortran.Found an interesting bug in the latest (6.0.5.2) and previous (6.0.4.2) LibreOffice Calc on MacOS 10.13.6. Is it intentional? TextWrangler did recognize the language automatically (as Fortran, not Fortran 9x), so I'm wondering why it doesn't take into account this important aspect of old Fortran code. I don't really understand this behavior of TextWrangler. If I type in a new line, however, the compiler will abort compilation if it starts before column 7 (which is the normal behavior). However, the compiler does not complain, and when I open the file with another editor, the code appears in the correct format. * call messagerun (1,'Proceeding with updating!')Ĭlearly, this does not reflect the actual structure of the code, as fixed-format Fortran statements may not start before column 7 (with a few exceptions). Open (9876, file=loadnam, status='unknown', form='binary') Loadnam=dirstate(1:NN)//'updatestate.sav' For example, the following random lines are displayed like this by TextWrangler: ! The following lines start on column 5! I noticed that the indentation in the editor window does not always correspond to the actual structure of the code. I recently switched from a Windows PC to a Mac, and I'm now using TextWrangler to edit my code. I am maintaining a program written mainly in fixed-format Fortran.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |